... to orientate yourself towards the truth
Picking up the watch that Willam Paley dropped, I'm telling a French scientist from Bordeaux to be bold: he's still a scientist* when he claims that completely invisible and undetectable black holes are responsible for the disappearance of everything that gets near them; that I'd still consider him a reasonable guy if he happened to believe that some invisible evolution is responsible for a lot of things in his body;that he should still be able to get papers published if he claimed it is some invisible, primitive and (now) dead people rather than wind that are responsible for thin, sharp stone objects found here and there by archaeologists;
or that behind all of the above cases there is someone intelligent, powerful, invisible and yet, oh, so living.
The man, a devout Catholic, isn't convinced. Somehow, as a scientist, he's ready to defend the first few contingent conclusions, but not the last, necessary one.
Why not? He can't really say, except that allegedly 'A Creator' cannot be involved in science.
Says who? Le Grand Orient de France? Richard Dawkins? The conformist scientific mainstream? Or those who sponsor it?
You know what? Bless them.
