Wednesday, 28 August 2013

The strength that goes on




(Beautiful women)


I asked the woman whether she had a strong opinion about some radical reforms introduced in her country many decades ago. She’d been telling me about some difficult old times and some good old times: her childhood in Cardiff, her Irish grandparents, her many siblings of whom many died, her difficult school years, the easy community spirit, the bustling port of Cardiff and thrilling Tiger Bay when they were still a bustling port and a thrilling bay*. “Of course I had a strong opinion.” She paused to build up the suspense, or so I thought. “But I just can’t remember what it was".

 
 
 
(The strength of the opinion survived, in memory, but not the opinion itself. Interesting.)

Tuesday, 27 August 2013

One man, one goal, one mission (yeah)



 
(Religion)

I have used this song twice before to illustrate a philosophical point, so how I could overlook what, or rather who, it really is about, just beats me. Here is a proper exegesis then:


(Excuse me and skip it if it’s been a no-brainer* to you all along)



One man[1], one goal[2],

One mission[3].

One heart[4], one soul[5],

Just one solution[6].

One flash of light[7], yeah[8],

One god[9], one vision[10].

One flesh[11], one bone[12],
 
One true religion[13].
 
One voice[14], one hope[15],

One real decision[16].

Give me one vision[17], yeah.

No wrong, no right[18].

I'm gonna tell you there's no black and no white.

No blood, no stain[19],

All we need is one worldwide vision[20].

[...]

Give me, give me, give me, give me, give me... fried chicken[21]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Jesus Christ

[2] The Kingdom of God

[3] To get ourselves and our siblings to want to get there, and to get there.

[4] His Heart

[5] Not literally: monism is unorthodox, unless ‘one soul’ refers God’s soul, which – or rather who - is the one source of all souls. 

[6] Jesus’ sacrifice

[7] The flash of our understanding of those things?

[8] Could be just a filler; or an expression of understanding that goes beyond the intellect (if it were merely intellectual understanding, we’d expect the standard ‘yes’) and encompasses the heart too.

[9] Naturally, or rather: supernaturally.

[10] Obvious, if you dig any of the preceding footnotes.

[11] Jesus’ body.

[12] A difficult one.

[13] Hinduism**

[14] Obvious

[15] Obvious

[16] “Jesus, I trust you."

[17] Well, here – among other redundant posts – it is.

[18] With the advent of the Kingdom of Heaven morality will become redundant, or more: it will disappear, because evil and wrong will disappear.

[19] As those who make it will regain blood, this line may refer to Jesus’ bloody and cleansing sacrifice, which will have done its job by then.

[20] Hear, hear

[21] An exegesis of fried chicken deserves a separate post.


*yes, I can see the potential to turn this against me, but I'm brave. And anyway, mockers gonna mock. (Well, I'm open minded too: they may be right. The thing is this doesn't look likely the way things, and prophesies, stand).

**O.K. - not funny.

The Local Council


I liked the way the man spoke: the educated Welsh accent that had an exotically local ring to it, but stayed well within the walls of the kind of English that, for better or worse, feels like second home to me. On top of that, I find Welsh intelligentsia, or the glimpses of them that I occasionally…  – actually, let’s talk about Jesus.

Monday, 26 August 2013

You're just a (freakish) kettle to me


 
If matter were the basis of life, including human life, no understanding would be possible. First of all, we could never grasp ourselves, because human mind doesn’t do matter. Matter is alien to us: we don’t think in particles, chemical compounds and electric charges, so the very core of our mind, if it were matter-based, would be for ever beyond our intellectual reach*. That would be very sad, but we’d probably learn to live with it, or get used to living with it.

The other major consequence apart from being sad would be simply scary: we would never understand others. As each body is different and each body keeps changing,  all communication would be superficial, all understanding  illusory – and we’d never even know how superficial or how illusory: there would be no reliable way to discuss it. The others would be using similar words and their minds would seem to operate in similar notions, but what exactly those words would trigger in them, or what exactly triggered those notions in them – we’d have no clue and we could never hope to have any clue.

The unfathomable others would at times seem reassuringly similar, at other times unsettlingly similar, but all the time they’d remain ubridgeably strange, which in the long run would make us frightened, demotivated and depressed. Like in those disturbing scenes from Disney’s take on Beauty and the Beast, which must scare the shit out of any metaphysician worth his salt, we’d find ourselves talking, arguing, singing and dancing with things that through some absurd (as everything would be absurd; matter never makes sense and matter, remember, would be our arche) miracle spookily began to act like we do. However, no matter (no pun intended) what we'd say, no matter what we'd sing, no matter what we'd cry, no matter who we’d love I’d always be just a freakish candlestick to you and you’d always be just a freakish kettle to me.
 
 
 
 
*this is all assuming that in some mad and absolutely impossible way it were possible for matter to be the basis of though, which it evidently is not, as we know (or bloody should know! or at least shouldn't tell Innocent pupils and students that we know when we don't bloody know.) Treat this post then as an odd Gedankenexperiment, which no serious civiliation would choose as a mainstream view, not to mention the main view, and teach it in schools, discuss in serious books published by respectable houses and promote in the media - surely.
 
Illustration: courtesy of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, if my candlestick memory serves me right.

Let's focus




I need to focus. I need to start my Get A Grip tour. I’ve looked at the scarily long list of my August posts and I realised I'm getting distracted. Not that I’m going to go fundamentalist now (or at least not any more), but I need to zoom in on what is – or who is  - crucial: religion, low taxation and wine. And beautiful women of course, the fruit of the former three*. Everything’s else a footnote.

 

*or at least I’m working on this thesis, philosophically.
 
P.S. On the other hand the universe needs footnotes, and summarising, and this is a blog after all. I don't know... I don't know. Well, I need to get a grip.

They once were lost, but now are found*

 

 
 It's O.K.  I've found them.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

Saturday, 24 August 2013

One Vision


If there is a vision behind the Universe, and there is, surely our task is to become reconciled with that vision. Philosophy’s role is to make us see this. Religion’s role is to make us achieve it.
 
 
 
(Somebody's vision too narrow again: it is mine or yours?)
 
 
P.S. I'd hesitate to call Freddie an authority on those matters, but for an über-Ultramontanist "one true religion" sounds impressively orthodox. More (on) fried chicken is coming up soon.

i appael toyou


I knpw Ive asked this beforre = but I'velost them gain: has qnyone seeen my glasses@ (No, not thh blue ines, yhe other ones)

Modern design reason's


 
I try not to quote too extensively here, but this deserves an exception:

As Tom Chivers noted in yesterday’s paper, some people are upset that The Apprentice’s Luisa Zissman has dropped the apostrophe from the name of her business, Bakers Toolkit. Still, she’s hardly the first. In 1968, Kingsley Amis wrote to the house magazine of the teaching profession. Its name: Teachers World. “Shouldn’t that name have an apostrophe?” suggested Amis. “But I suppose it is safer to drop it if you aren’t too sure where it should go.” [I know it's bad style to butt in half-quote with 'Ha!Ha!Ha!', even if one gets his spelling right, but you must forgive me*: Ha! Ha! Ha! ]

In reply the editor called Amis “a bit of a pedant” and said the apostrophe was dropped “for modern design reasons”. Thereafter in the Amis household, any instance of illiteracy was dryly attributed to “modern design reasons”.

(By Michael Deacon, in the on-line edition of The Daily Telegraph)

 


*it's my blog, in case you forget.

 

P.S. "Michael Deacon is the Telegraph's Parliamentary Sketchwriter. He also writes about TV and books" - in this order, it doesn't sound like a paricularly favourable review of his books. (I've just realised the syntax's equivocal - or I can't read properly - and perhaps he doesn't write books at all).

 

 

Unravelling



Unravelling, perhaps even derailed yet, even as we ride.


P.S. The local state, never mind the HS2.






This one as a bonus. I just hope it a photomontage or photoshop. (I wouldn't be myself if I didn't ask: And where the hell do you think you're heading?)

Friday, 23 August 2013

Man-made


I couldn’t work it out. When I first saw the painting face to face it struck me as friendly and warm, perhaps in a non-committed way, but nonetheless warm. Then I read the note next to it and was disturbed. It had a quote from a letter from Vincent to Theo and his wife, Jo (he was to write just two more letters in his life): “They’re immense stretches of wheatfields under turbulent skies, and I made a point of trying to express sadness, extreme loneliness.”

But I didn’t see that. Maybe it was the colours, which immediately reinforced my fixed, overarching association of the painter with the south of France; maybe it was my bias towards optimism – I can’t say. I simply couldn’t see the down side of what he was painting, even when it was certified by van Gogh himself.

 
 

I kept returning to the painting to search for that hidden sadness and loneliness. Whenever I stood before it, I tried to force myself to see in it what I thought wasn’t there. Slowly the painting was becoming neutral to me. Then the picture grew colder and stranger. At some point I noticed that the field in the bottom left-hand corner, which earlier looked vibrant and inviting, like a good childhood summer, now was chaotic and hostile. Gradually I was beginning to feel some inhuman cold emanating from it. It may have been the mercilessness of nature that I was registering or the dangerous disharmony in a place where one expected safe order – I couldn’t say, all I knew was that it started to disturb me. The colours were still warm, but not warm enough. They  were lukewarm, they didn’t care, there was no warmth underneath them. I realized that they were capable of cruel indifference and, at least for a moment, I disliked them.

Then it happened: one day, a minute or so into another meeting, the painting became transformed for me and started dragging me down, I was afraid. And at last I understood. Just like van Gogh’s depression, the sadness and loneliness weren’t there - just like they weren't here - in the first place: they are man-made.

 

 
 
 
 

7.30 (And Counting), We Are On Our Way To*...



It’s 7.30 (and counting) in the morning and I can – without any particular enthusiasm; how ridiculously easy it comes to us to take life for granted!** - report two ugly male bodies (separately), alive. We seem to have had quite a good night’s sleep, after I'd finished blogging about the Lord of the Moon, an idiot’s soul and his hellish prospects and after he'd grown tired of watching some hard-core porn, both of us using a fast wi-fi connection offered by the mobile phone belonging to that good pal because of whom*** the idiot had landed on the street in the first place.


*I'm not suggesting anything: it's such a frighteningly dynamic world 

**there must be some breath-taking meaning and wisdom in that.
***well, unless you’re a Satanist, you’ll excuse my making a long story short; otherwise: it was because of Satan in the first place.

Pathetically inadequate


An Eastern European guy I know (but perhaps shouldn’t) told me he'd texted his beautiful 13-year-old daughter in the middle of the previous night saying 'good-bye' and informing her that he was about to kill himself. For some reason he didn't live up to his promise and was now bothering me.

A couple of days earlier, I learnt, he'd messed up his situation - his life has been messed up for ages - in a most idiotic way: he beat up a close pal of his, both of them stoned into complete idiocy, got kicked out of where he was staying and ended up sleeping rough (again) until I decided to put him up. It wasn't an obvious decision: I'd written the man off a good while ago and most of the time I was deeply convinced that he was as good as condemned, a conviction I accpted  with some sadness, but also with unsettling calm. Now I was going to play a Christian again. 

(Funny how a small practical gestrue can trigger off a fundamental existential rethinking: as soon as I'd made my offer, I opened the door not only to him but also to a hope that he may, somehow, avoid Hell; I can't rule out that it was more about me than him: I didn't want to be thinking I was wasting a good deed on a hopeless case).

When he turned up, one day later than agreed (owing to a tenner I'd lent him, which he spent on some cheap cider, which in turn made it of no significance to him whether it was a patch of grass or a mattress that he was sleeping on) I set him a condition: he had to text his daughter that he was O.K. and sorry and that he loved her, which - who knows - might even be true. He agreed and.... I got to send the message: there was no credit left on his mobile and his fingers were too big and clumsy to tackle my BlackBerry’s tiny keys.

Immediately after I'd typed in her name, 'sorry', 'love', 'Daddy' and a few other words in a language that was foreign to me , I realised what a pathetically inadequate do-gooder I was: what if this idiot* (who’s sitting now on my sofa even as I write this) goes and hangs himself after all? He had tried that before, but a technical glitch spoiled his plans. What if the girl has somehow accepted and understood her dad’s – and her own – fate, and now I’m just messing her up? What if I have to text her tomorrow: “Your dad's body is dangling from a local bridge, and he's on his way to hell, if you ask me”and sign it: “A bloody naïve fool that put it in his head that you can mend things on the cheap, whereas in real life someone has to die”?






*yes, yes: a brother too; but unfortunately I can’t see how one rules out the other. Additionaly, I feel encouraged to use describe him in harsh terms becasuse - after some adjustements regarding social class, style and type of drink - his story is quite similar to mine. Well, except the suicidal bit. (He's just shown me a piece of black string that he carries in his pocket and instructed me how to do it on a door handle... blimey! I hope he won't do it here).
 
 

Not there yet


Ex nihilo, ex isting*, contingent and dual,

(but practically single ;)

Searching for one more metaphysical word

With the mind haunted by the body problem,

Scared by Keynes, dead in both runs

(Perhaps both of us)

I inflate. So Lord of the Moon,

burst me.

 

 

*no, I don’t think it works
**but don't fool yourself: I'm not giving up

Thursday, 22 August 2013

A funny world


A strange song reaches me* from the computer used by a mentally disturbed woman who is sitting next to me. She keeps talking to herself, making occasional angry hisses and burping. Then she goes quiet,  lulled into peace by that strange song. Her phone rings and instead of a nutter I hear a composed woman and a perfectly coherent conversation regarding a favour and the settling a small debt. After she hangs up, she goes back to recreational burping and relaxed watching whatever she’s watching. I can't help but take a peep at what’s going on in her little corner of the virtuality: there, hordes of uniformed women march across what looks like Tiananmen Sq in Beijing – and sing the exotically serene song in a far-away language and, for a mentally disturbed moment, I feel like joining in.

It's a funny world.

 

*in the local central library that offers a faster internet connection than my dongle (I mean the T-Mobile one.)

Consolidate



(Isn’t it obvious* that)

Any gap, any crack, any loose brick, any porous patch in you, will be used by Satan, if he exists.

So consolidate, close ranks, make yourself compact, dense and lean. Don’t take your time, don’t do things at your own pace, don't give him a break while you're looking for light ex oriente, trying greater or smaller Vehicles, letting the New Age tinker with you, having a spliff or two, or checking out if rock’n’roll can save too. Want peace and understanding? Grab the beads and para bellum.




*This is for those who know he exists. If you don’t, go back to ‘somewhere and somehow’, start from there, reach God and then come back. Well, actually then you won't need to come back here... (probably you even shouldn't, as one of my aims is to help you collapse; because you will collapse) >
 

 
 

Wednesday, 21 August 2013

She* loves Keats


Not by me, but I do too.


P.S. I remember reading a biographical note about Keats a couple of years ago and thinking: “Fucking** scientific Pharisees!” when I learnt how a metaphysical claim recklessly made by some physicist or physician skewed Keats' understanding of what he and the Universe were about.
 


*I assume, for some reason, that it was a girl.
**yes, my swearing is a problem. I've done some thinking about it and pinpointed the problem. (So expect soon more on this damned subject).

Lord of the Moon



Some time ago I declared myself a poet. You may have been wondering how the words are lining up. Well, not very well. Like a heavy cloud mid-way across the sky on a windless day; like a 1985 Soviet-made Lada, bought from a dodgy dealer, on its way up; like a ball that was rolling downhill really fast but then reached a flat stretch and - the flat stretch being pretty long –  began losing its momentum, ran into a few small stones, which were not big enough to stop it, but fatally slowed the ball until it lost the momentum completely*, I have stalled, mid-verse.

However, once a poet, always a poet, as an old adage goes, or at least should go. So the other day a line got out of me. I stopped and waited for a few more, so that I could package them nicely and sell as a cheap poem-let, but more never arrived and I got stranded with just one - pretty dramatic, but still single – sentence, which however hard I might try I would have difficulty selling, even to my staunches fans, as a poem, or even half-limerick.

Whatever you think of me as a poet, you can’t say I’m one of those lazy gits who are shameless enough to bundle a few random lines and call them a poem. I’m too word-proud to stoop to passing off incoherent prose as poetry. I may not practice it myself, but I preach slog.

I have decided then to try a less usual approach to get my poetic juices flowing. Let’s call it word charming. Just like in worm charming you do various strange things to the ground in which what you’re after lives, I’ll be doing various strange things to the mind – or the mind-cloud – in which what I’m after …. whatever words** do before they get out . The first trick will be to beat on the stubborn ground of my imagination with an imaginary review of a poem I should have written driven, or pulled, by that one line that came to me one night when, on a cold and empty night, I was walking down a narrow street in what seemed then a narrow town somewhere north of a wine label.

"The excruciating wait has been rewarded. The hype - done justice to. The whole print – nicked. The collateral merchandise - really cute (a bit expensive, though).

Fifty three years after his first volume (just two poems and one limerick, but as good as twice as many) caused lasting ripples in the literary world, the poet currently known as A has published, as an investigative team of the Washington Post sensationally established last week, another volume. The three and a half - but what a half! – poems were sprayed on the pavements of the world’s major cities last October, triggering a series of wild speculations as to their authorship (for obvious reasons Homer and Keats were ruled out early on). The verses, as we all remember,  were accompanied by Banksy’s*** drawings. The pavements were demolished soon afterwards and the slabs with the writing on them – stolen, no doubt for the poetry rather than Banksy’s quite two-dimensional works.

While the critical spotlight has been understandably directed at the opening piece with its 577 verses,  45 stanzas and its Greek-tragedy type choruses, the volume’s gem is undeniably its enigmatic two page-long closing chord.

In the most original opening I have read in two weeks, five metaphysical themes are raised high up, like grand standards before a mediaeval battle, and flutter over our heads, or lives, for a brief moment, before we are taken, in a dramatic swoop, to a musty basement crammed with paintings by old masters. Then a series of half-identified people, objects and animals float past us in what feels like a hot and unfocused Central European summer.
Suddenly and without any thought-out justification John Maynard Keynes turns up, “dead in both runs”, and scares the shit out of us, as he bloody well should. At this point the poem, inflated with meaningless words just like the economy can be inflated with meaningless money, seems to be on the verge of a destructive explosion that will lay bare its emptiness. The sentences hurt physically.

Out of this chaos, three sublime lines conjure up a woman’s face. She leads us into a snow-covered, Christmas-lit calm, and there we wake up lying motionless on the cobble stones of a small alley, surrounded by a pack of wolfish looking hooded beasts. Before we can decide whether they are there to comfort, destroy  or both, a rather attractive silhouette gets thrillingly close, obstructing “the silver watermelon”**** . Then someone whispers a line that’s here to stay, one of those controversial – and cheesy some might say (and have said) - hallmark lines that simply have to, regardless of what the Washington Post guys tell us, come from a poem by A
Lord of the Moon, burst me.
 
 
 
 
*the Homeric thing; in case you wonder.
**or thoughts; what a mysterious relation…
***Banksy still denies offering a six figure sum for the privilege of having his name associated with A; it was allegedly a five-figure sum.
****presumably the Moon

Tuesday, 20 August 2013

The rule of thumb

(Just in case:)

When in doubt, blame democracy.

Making sense of Egypt

 
The Muslim Brotherhood: good or bad? Nobody knows, especially the voters.
 

I don't pretend to understand Egyptian politics, or any democratic politics for that matter*, but this much I know: by the look of things, it's going to be damn hard for the Muslim Brotherhood to convice global public opinion that its freshly arrested spiritual leader Mohammed Badie is a goodie.



*well, who on earth can understand democratic politics? You can manipulate it, buy it or rig it - but dig it??


P.S. Of course, it would be absurd to suggest that what's happening right now in Egypt is democratic politics, but.... well, it's just absurd. (This much I know, however: there's no shame in getting carried away into the absurd when slagging off democracy.)

WSexJ





The Wall Street Journal, otherwise quite a decent newspaper, has just facebooked me with a hot piece of info: "Employees that have sex more than four times a week receive 5% higher wages."

Cool it though if you were going to revolutionise your lifesyle: 76.3% of statistics are made up on the spot.

Monday, 19 August 2013

Let's share


A sharply-dressed, smart looking and unsettlingly focused corporate man passes me* and I think: if I had his drive and discipline, I’d be going places. If he had my philosophy, he'd be going places wisely. Then I notice an elderly down-and-out whom I’ve seen around town for a couple of months now. His face has never shown anything else than external peace and inner understanding and I think: if both the corporate man and I had the old guy’s peace and understanding, we’d not only be going places wisely, but we’d also be going places serenely. At that moment a beautiful young woman crosses my path and I (or perhaps even all three of us) can’t help but think: if only we could have, what she has…




*in St David’s Centre. After, justifiably, branding it as obnoxiously false-godly, I feel really embarassed ever to go there, or admit it. When I do, I sneak from behind one pile of redundant goods to behind# another, in case anyone I know is visiting this den of rampantly pagan consumerism at the same time.

#English good?

Somehow and Somewhere*



A radio presenter relates Mo Farah's victory: "... and then somehow and somewhere [praise be to His name!] he found the strength..."




*which is a good starting point for your metaphysical reflection, but not good enough in the long run. (All set and ready? Bloody go!)



Photo: Getty Images

Saturday, 17 August 2013

The Mass Mess

Far from perfect, but one is better than (too) many


The extremely depressing development of events in Egypt illustrates the system's greatest fallacy: regardless of the content of their incoherent wishes, it's the very involvement of the masses, and the fatal illusion that they are able to co-run the state, that condemns democracy.




The worst thing is: nobody, including themselves, has a bloody idea what they want.
 
 
 
 
Photo by Ahmed Youssef , via

Friday, 16 August 2013

The Present Imperfect (and Tense)


It's been drawn yet. You'll never square it up
 
 

Forget your sins: your mere imperfections will drag you down. The discrepancy between the ideal image of ourselves that we, miraculously, have and the reality of being regularly and dependably off the mark is bound to produce unbearable tension that will topple us.

For a while, when we are young and with the help of faith and/or a whole range of outrageously bogus psychological techniques, we may be able to sustain a vision, or illusion, of our prospective perfection; we may fool ourselves that one day, with our eyes not quite in focus, we may get to see the ideal version of ourselves, the one we invented as late kids or early teenagers and then kept nourishing, polishing and modifying.


But then comes a moment, and mine came yesterday evening, when we get overwhelmed by our flawed record and, finally, it becomes perfectly clear to us that there is just no way we can cut off that long train we drag full of the imperfections we committed and that we'll never manage to re-edit, re-publish or even airbrush the past - all the slightly or largely misused, mistaken, misunderstood, misconceived, missaid, mispresented, missing and missed stuff. What's more, we realise that we have been shaped as much by our perfect vision as by our imperfect execution, so even if the ideal is somewhere in Heaven, it definitely won’t be seen down here: we are fataly and frustratingly locked in an imperfect circle till we die, in most likelihood - imperfectly.






The botched circle from: neogaf.com

 

Have faith. And a pint.


I pray, don't close pubs! Have Brains.

(A case for a spirited revival)

A while ago I was chatting to a fellow Christian who was telling me about a spectacular Welsh religious revival over a century ago. I am a great believer in life in general and, as a guy that is a lot of the time half-dead through sin, in revivals in particular, so I listened with some interest; especially that it’s impossible not to have grave concerns about what’s left of the soul of Wales: it’s obvious that this country needs a spiritual revival, perhaps even more urgently than the abolishment of income tax.

The good man kept enlightening me: ‘Did you know that people quit drinking en masse and hundreds of pubs had to close down?’ I didn’t and it came as a blow. I still believed the revival we were talking about might have been, somehow, a good idea and I still believed that another one is overdue. But I also firmly believed, and I still do, that there is always room for improvement.
 
 
 
P.S. ... ( or actually, maybe I should leave it: speaking of a Pubs' Revival might verge on ourageous in this context. But then again... - no, forget it.)

Thursday, 15 August 2013

Worth it

 
If this is cruelty to animals, it's worth it.

Blame it on the Mormons




I realise that some readers may have doubts whether what I’m just going to share with you merits a mention in a serious blog like this one (and I have to be absolutely honest with you: I have some doubts too; however, I believe that truth needs to be told as well as felt), but isn’t it frustrating when you put something* somewhere and then can’t find it?




*especially when it's something that is normally in its obvious, usual, easily reachable place: in the middle of the room, (somewhere) on the floor.

Illustration from: The Nursery, A Monthly Magazine for Youngest Readers, No. 107, November, 1875, Vol. XVIII.

Wednesday, 14 August 2013

The Missionary Man


 
A stone’s throw (no, I’m not violent … or is it just… - what the heck am I on about??) away from the day when I passed that cold modernist building of the Mormon HQ in London, I ran into a couple of Latter Day Saints in Cardiff. From one outrageous heresy to another, they ended up inviting themselves to my place to try to mess me up. I boldly confirmed the invitation and decided to do some missionary work myself and bring them back to the Roman fold, or at least to the Christian and Trinitarian* fold.
The aim of turning around two psyched-up guys from the Wild West woud be a challnege even for Buffalo Bill, not to mention an elderly preacher with poor eyesight that shoots from the hip and tends to jump the gun. And the hellishly difficult effort involved could overwhelm a whole monastery-ful of Benedictines, not to mention a single lazy layman. So please support me with your prayers (or crossed fingers, or whatever you fool yourself with, if you’re heathen) in overcoming what looms like.... well, what litterally is a steep montain of paper and assorted clothes: I need to tidy up my place before 8 p.m.

 

 
P.S. I’m looking around, even as I write this, and think: there’s no way,  just no way... I’ll have to call the thing off and let them go to hell after all.

 

 

*the poor (&usually quite rich) lost sheep are neither

The Dropped Racquet

 
 
What's the world - or Westminster - coming to?
 
 
 
 
(So where am I going to fool myself that I'm topping up my soul?)

A blue cock

A blue cock, next to a grey shaft*.
 
 
 
*apologies; just couldn't resist exposing them. (Can't I be pubescently puerile again, just for a moment, before I die?

Tuesday, 13 August 2013

A stalker to the cute


 
I'd been stalking them for a moment, attracted by the hats and the sweet playfulness and tenderness of the three girls...
 
 
... when one of them noticed me, a moment before her little sister got down from her mom's arms and started to dance on the pavement, as she went along, and sing something silly in a foreign language.

I re-directed my camera and pretended to be interested in a Mormon 'temple', but continued to snap the happy bunch for another minute or two, because the non-negotiable thing about me is that I will stalk the cute, always, everywhere and openly. I promise.

Coming out on top

The woman told me not to take pictures (inside the National Gallery). But I sank her demand and won the battle.

The new Routemaster: cool it, Boris.



The 'Boris bus', the new Routemaster (the one I’m sitting on) is cool, except that it's hot. 

(And what the heck’s wrong with the windows? I struggled and struggled, but they just wouldn’t open…)

Two tickets, please


A stone's throw (no, I'm not violent; I'm angry, but I don't blow it; unless I have to) away from the Royal Albert Hall. Right opposite another place that similarly attracts confused people: the Science Museum, which is next door to the chief fallacy and heresy monger: the Natural History Museum.


I really don't know what stopped me, at the last moment, from going in and asking for two tickets for that night's show.  
 

 

P.S. Mormons* piss me off: walking around telling people, in the worst parochial petty non-conformist spirit, that the Holy Spirit and Christianity went to sleep for a few hundred years, just after Jesus went to Heaven, only to wake up again after some confused preacher from some American sticks stumbled upon something or other in a forest. Joseph Smith, now in the know, must be turning in his grave when he hears such bollocks.
Not that I am in principle against tearaway sects that make outlandish claims. However, to gain my support they need to be right as well as successful (the latter confirming the former); and ideally supervised by the Vatican.
 
*Extremely nice folks, by the way; and some of the best employers that have ever made a mistake of employing me.
 

 
 
 
 

Monday, 12 August 2013

A jolly good urban show (a bit bonkers, though)


The rascal at the BBC Electric Proms in 2009
P.S. “Some people say I’m bonkers, but I just think I’m free." Bonkers.






The last Proms concert I went to during that visit to the Metropolis was the Urban Classic one. Dizzee Rascal wasn’t there, but a few of his mates were: some raised the roof, others just the eyebrows. Unfortunately, the orchestra, led by Jules Buckley, played the second fiddle for a lot of the time, so at times the gig tasted half-baked. I must finish on a happier note: for all its acquired and inherent faults, the BBC can still do inspired and inspiring stuff.
Maveric Sabre: the first in the line-up, deservedly; a hoarsely brilliant maveric.
 
Mvula: I bet she has a future, but for the time being - a bit overrated as a song-writer and a tad monotonous as a singer. I didn like what seemed an affected manner in her singing.

 
 
"Lady" Leshurr: yes, funny, if that was the idea; but needs to work on her elocution.
Fazer: mixed feelings (mine; those of a contingent of hard-core fans present in the Royal Albert Hall were pretty unmixed: they screamed every time his name, or just the first letter thereof, was mentioned; and at various other times). No mixed feelings about the Seven Chapters, though - a medley crew of his protégés – who sang and played just  another bland pop number,  perhaps produced and written by Fazer himself.


(Too) relative to me


"According to an old saying in the Port trade, every wine would be a Port, if it could." Ha! Ha! (Otherwise: rubbish).

Strange how the great British port families feel like relatives to me, an ordinary one-bottle man.  (A thought which drifted towards me when I was draining, at a funny morning hour, an illegitimate bottle of Dow's).


The Younger one. (Three)



P.S.  In 1799, 44 million litres (over 11.6 million US gallons) of Port were imported by the English - an equivalent of five litres for every man, woman and child in England. During this period, Port became associated with the "Englishman's drink" with social clubs touting membership of "three-bottle men*" or those who were able to drink at least three bottles of Port in one sitting. Among the notable men who touted this accomplishment were William Pitt the Younger and the playwright Richard Brinsley Sheridan. (wikipedia)
*Not that I remember it too clearly, but I must have been, at wilder times, a two-bottle man. However, I don't feel envious: I guess there is some wisdom in power being wielded by the stronger; as long as they listen to the wiser.