Why bother having a socialist state, which the U.K. is, if the national broadcaster can't be bothered to use the heaps of taxpayers money that it gets to buy and broadcast the most important event of one of the most imprtant national sports*?
1979 or 1980 (not that I watched cricket then; well, not that I watch it now, for that matter)
*and the broadcaster that can be bothered charges for it as if this were a free-market state.
