... Or?
I’m working on a list of psychologico-existentialist (probably the same
thing, but as I’m not sure, let me throw in both adjectives; and it sounds more
academic, too) postulates for the existence of God.
They all boil down to one, which goes, roughly, like this:
a guarantee of total repossession, total compensation, total realisation of the totality of all the potential aspects of things, situations and people - basically a guarantee of an access to the absolute completeness of everything potentially accessible via human faculties - seems to be a basic need of our psyche*, without which it cannot function properly, nor we can live fully happily.
Only an (The, more accurately and respectfully) eternal, omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent God can provide such a guarantee.
And I know I may be stretching things a bit now, but I think I can include somewhere here the guarantee of the complete recovery of missed punch lines.
a guarantee of total repossession, total compensation, total realisation of the totality of all the potential aspects of things, situations and people - basically a guarantee of an access to the absolute completeness of everything potentially accessible via human faculties - seems to be a basic need of our psyche*, without which it cannot function properly, nor we can live fully happily.
Only an (The, more accurately and respectfully) eternal, omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent God can provide such a guarantee.
*mine, to be precise, at this stage of the project - but I'm going to either prove that it's also the case with you, or talk you into feeling it.
